[jdev] Re: Definition of XMPP v0.0

[Vinod Panicker]

Any thoughts on this anyone?

I know I'm being pedantic here ;)

On 8/10/05, Vinod Panicker <vinod.p at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> RFC 3920 states that -
> 
>    4.  If either entity receives a stream header with no 'version'
>        attribute, the entity MUST consider the version supported by the
>        other entity to be "0.0" and SHOULD NOT include a 'version'
>        attribute in the stream header it sends in reply.
> 
> What is the definition / content of XMPP v0.0?  What is a compliant
> XMPP v0.0 entity expected to support?
> 
> Regards,
> Vinod.
>