[jdev] QNEXT versus GAIM and JABBER and JetiAnts.tk

[Justin Karneges]

On Sunday 31 October 2004 02:49 pm, Bart van Bragt wrote:
> But it's a real pity that they don't use Jabber for IM, but I guess that
> wouldn't work well with their P2P setup (if they are using P2P for chats).

It looks like text chat is completely optional, depending on whether or not 
you've set up an account with the big 4.  This leads me to believe that the 
text chatting is always based on one of these services and therefore not p2p, 
and that the other features (like video conferencing) are not based on 
existing IM protocols like AIM or MSN.

With this in mind, there's no reason they couldn't have supported Jabber.  For 
some reason they have ICQ.  Didn't our userbase surpass that of ICQ?

-Justin