[jdev] voicechat again

Timothy Carpenter timbeau_hk at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Mar 3 04:54:25 CST 2004


> 
> You probably already knew most of this, but I just thought I'd suggest that
> paragraph above, that you do not need to chose one over the other necessarily,
> and that we can use their advantages and disadvantages to produce some
> algorithm by which we choose one over the other.
> 
> Ido
> 

Well, this was my view and about where it was in the previous argument - one
protocol to spool them all, one protocol to find them...

Tim

> On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 10:00:41 -0000
> "Richard Dobson" <richard at dobson-i.net> wrote:
> 
>>> then here is the simple way for this §!&%§$% p2p case:
>> 
>> If as I suspect the symbols above represent a swearword I suggest you calm
>> down and rethink your posts or risk severly denting your credibility, such
>> comments are not very professional and IMO are not appropriate here. If you
>> do not want to make useful posts then I suggest you dont post, these rants
>> are just a waste of bandwidth and peoples time.
>> 
>>> 1) use JEP 95 to negotiate the voice session parameters
>>>     * includes voice codec ID
>>>     * includes frame size (i.e. 2600byte)
>>>     * includes crunched size if applicable
>>>     * includes channels (mono/stereo)
>>>     * includes sample size (8bit/16bit/24bit/32bit)
>>>     * includes sample rate (i.e. 8000hz/16000hz)
>>> 2) do JEP65 stream negotation.
>>> go, implement it.
>> 
>> Seems a reasonable starting point.
>> 
>>> i really give favor to server based approaches.
>> 
>> As you have indicated previously, but just because you dont think it useful
>> or a good idea doesnt mean it isnt and other people dont want it. Im not
>> against server based approaches (infact its a very good idea) but there is
>> plenty of room and requirement for both options, you really shouldnt be
>> required to go via a server for a quick couple of minute two person chat.
>> 
>> Richard
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> jdev mailing list
>> jdev at jabber.org
>> https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
>> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFARbcTmhQsAkXAJP0RApomAJ9c74BSNE6Uj1XuQDhkFzwIg5if0QCeMgnF
> vkikBCqftEUtYuCBQf3vZR0=
> =5dtJ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev




More information about the JDev mailing list