[jdev] JOSL 1.1?

[Paul Curtis]

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> This got me to thinking: would
> developers be interested in having the JSF function as a trusted third
> party for code? If so, it might make sense to develop JOSL 1.1 to cover
> such code, with the JSF as the licensor (JOSL 1.0 says Jabber Inc. is the
> licensor but that is a confusing historical artifact). If developers like
> this idea, I will work to develop a JOSL 1.1 license.

Is there any reason to have a separate license? Is there any reason NOT 
to the the GPL for this?

paul