[jdev] Re: MSN: an open protocol?

[Mattias Campe]

James Bunton wrote:
>>It states "an open protocol in MSN's case", but is MSN like completely open?
>>I thought it was a closed protocol, or isn't it completely closed? Or did
>>the author meant "an open protocol in Jabbers case".  
> 
<snip explanation/>
> 
> Hope that clears it up for you..

Yes, thanks! Still a question: is MSNP10 based on the SIMPLE "standard"? 
I place standard between quotes, because I thought that that 
specification isn't finished yet...


greetings,
Mattias Campe