[JDEV] XHTML Inband Images update
Trejkaz Xaoza
trejkaz at xaoza.net
Wed Jan 21 01:56:11 CST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 08:51, Richard Dobson wrote:
> > 'drop down emoticon' trend, people who want a specific image can send the
> > image, and emoticons can return to being purely pretty-printed text like
> > they're supposed to be.
>
> The main reason is so you can include arbitary images without having to
> reference them on an http server will all the problems that entails, but
> yes it can be used for custom emoticon graphics as well as other arbitary
> images you wish to display to someone in a chat, but it is designed to be
> flexible so that it is not restricted to images and could perhaps be used
> for other things like sound effects.
There's your issue. If you use <img/> you won't be using it for sound
effects.
> Use of the object tag is specified as MUST NOT be supported in the XHTML-IM
> specification in JEP-0071 so we cannot use that.
This sounds more like a problem with XHTML-IM than with using the <object/>
tag. We would have to make them change their minds on which tag to use and
mark <img/> as MUST NOT or SHOULD NOT, since the <img/> tag is about to
become deprecated.
The only issue I can think regarding <object/> is it has one more attribute
you have to specify (the content type.)
> No it originally stood for inline (hence the title), plus ive look it up on
> dictionary.com and imbedded does seem to be a valid spelling, although yes
> I think it is usually spelt with an e.
Yeah, I see. "imbedded" is listed as an alternative definition but judging by
the fact that "embedded" has several more entries, it's probably the "right"
spelling.
I keep getting pissed off with my boss over the same issue, every time he
leaves one spelling in a document I'm correcting it to the other. Gotta have
consistency though. :-/
TX
- --
'Every sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic' -
Arthur C Clarke
'Every sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology' - Tom
Graves
Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <trejkaz at xaoza.net>
Web site: http://xaoza.net/trejkaz/
Jabber ID: trejkaz at jabber.xaoza.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD4DBQFADjCdmifzwBMPxxoRArRQAJ9PiySt3+qnlwCJS/STWxvruhWEBACYpbLr
gX9mDg+QqLJuWY2F36Gpjg==
=FN12
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the JDev
mailing list