[jdev] Reliable presence

[Justin Karneges]

On Wednesday 11 August 2004 11:15 am, JD Conley wrote:
> the remote server.  Thus, something like the proposed ping protocol
> would be required, not just a connection attempt.  I've spent a great
> deal of time thinking about how to best fix this issue in our server and
> have come to the same conclusions as Justin.

Unfortunately, 4 out of 5 council members have already objected to the JEP on 
the council mailing list.  This is probably some sort of record.  The only 
hold-out is rob, who told me this morning that he needs to read up on JEP-79 
(AMP) before he can form an opinion.

That said, would it hurt for the council to write to the public standards-jig 
so we can have an actual discussion?  Better yet, can they _read_ it also?  
It's not like this is a new topic, and we even have an active thread going.

-Justin