[jdev] Jabberd2, Flash Client and terminator character...
dlb
civintel at comcast.net
Tue Apr 13 12:34:29 CDT 2004
What if the Flash c2s code were implemented as a J2 transport ?
* Is the 1.4 version portable to J2 ?
Official support could be accommodated by JEP-124, or
some other HTTP bound JEP.
Flash requires a socket protocol transformation,
not a xmpp definition. In fact, it's when you attempt
to define a Flash session that you corrupt the
xmpp stream. So IMO we should externalize
the Flash c2s as a 'transparent' transport. Then we
could do away w/ the <flash:stream> scheme
and simply dedicate flash connections to a given port.
does this make sense ?
- david
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew A. Miller" <linuxwolf at outer-planes.net>
To: "Jabber software development list" <jdev at jabber.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: [jdev] Jabberd2, Flash Client and terminator character...
> Well, "step 0" is usually to see if any of the existing JEPs even come
> close to what you need to accomplish. Without this step, the council
> and/or JEP editor may deny your JEP submission. I think you've already
> accomplished this one, though (but a double-check doesn't hurt) (-:
>
> If there is a JEP or two, then the current council would *strongly*
> recommend you first try collaborating with those JEP(s)'s author(s).
> Sometimes this works, sometimes it doesn't. If not, then I would
> strongly recommend first reading the Jabber Protocol Tao (at
> http://www.jabber.org/wiki/index.php/ProtocolTao). I would next
> recommend you start jotting down your thoughts on that same wiki,
> although this isn't necessarily required (especially if you've already
> got a good plan and rationale).
>
> Given the current discussion, I personally don't fully understand why
> JEP-0124 (at the least) cannot accomodate you, but I'm willing to be
> instructed (-: Just be sure to provide a pretty detailed section on why
> other JSF JEPs/ IETF RFCs don't meet the requirements but your JEP does.
>
> I look forward to seeing your proposal.
>
>
> - LW
>
>
> Sean Voisen wrote:
>
> >I'm not at all familiar with the process, so is a JEP the way to go? How
> >do these things get started?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >- Sean
> >
> >Sean Voisen
> >Weblog: http://voisen.org
> >Flash/XMPP: http://xifflabs.com
> >XIFF 2.0: http://www.jabberstudio.org/projects/xiff
> >_______________________________________________
> >jdev mailing list
> >jdev at jabber.org
> >https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
More information about the JDev
mailing list