[JDEV] Re: jabberd 1.4.3 release candidate again
Frank Seesink
frank at mail.wvnet.edu
Mon Nov 3 11:04:40 CST 2003
maqi at jabberstudio.org wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Frank Seesink wrote:
>
>
>>mod_auth_crypt.c also showed that libcrypt ("-lcrypt") was not part of
>>the standard LIBS definition in Cygwin. Not sure if this latter part is
>>Cygwin-specific
>
> No. The "-lcrypt" was present in version 1.41 of jsm/Makefile but got lost
> in the last commit. I'll fix it.
Ok, cool.
>>If you need any more information, or need me to send this any other way,
>>please let me know.
>
> As already mentioned in the mail I wrote to you yesterday, I suggest to
> move the contents of the Cygwin README to the jabberd's WWW pages.
>
> There's a kind of template at
> http://jabberd.jabberstudio.org/1.4/doc/?page=winguide
> , just click on "Edit this page" at the bottom.
Apologies. I tend to use Mozilla as my newsreader, hooking in to
Gmane.org's NNTP feed for this mailing list. Hadn't checked my email
this weekend, so I missed your private emails. Sorry about that.
I will do as you suggest above. Also, as you suggested in the private
emails, I will
* update the sample jabber.xml file and post here when ready
* send the necessary Makefile changes to the respective module owners
for JUD, MU-Conference, etc.
* read up on cvs diff -u (again, sorry for that. Just haven't had much
time to read up on diff. I understand what it does; just need to get
comfortable with the switches/etc.)
>>By the way, I noticed your vote to *exclude* GNU Pth from the 1.4.3
>>distribution. Is that the plan?
>
> Unless anybody comes up with a decent counter-argument, yes ;-).
>
>>For folks not altogether familiar with the Pth library, this exclusion
>>might cause more grief.
>
> Jabberd is the only piece of software I know that comes with the libraries
> it needs. While I can understand that this is handy sometimes, I think it
> causes several problems. For example, on better OS distributions the
> libraries should be retrieved and updated from the OS's repository
> ("apt-get install...", "emerge..."). Also, if you read the mailing list
> archive, you see that admins often encounter problems due to pth being
> compiled but not properly installed ("pth.h not found").
Point taken, and you're right. OS repositories (even one as simple as
Cygwin's setup.exe) are definitely better. So no counter-argument from
me. :-) [Just have to add some instructions for Cygwin users, as Pth
isn't installed nor available currently as a Cygwin package, and so will
require a manual download/compile/install. More to add to jabberd's WWW
pages.]
More information about the JDev
mailing list