[JDEV] JabberCentral [Was: Trillian Poll]
Rachel Blackman
rcb at ceruleanstudios.com
Mon Jun 16 11:35:43 CDT 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> The main point in this 'discussion' is the fact that rachel said
> 'official client' (mind the quotes!!) while (IMO) she meant; recommended
> client.
Actually, someone else used 'official client,' so I just adopted the same
terminology in my posts. 'Recommended client' works. I don't think
'supported client' (that someone else suggested) is any better than
'official client' because it implies the other clients are unsupported,
i.e. might not work on that server.
And can I just note this whole terminology discussion is kinda silly in my
opinion? No offense, but my impression is that everyone agrees /something/
has to happen to bring more general IM users onto Jabber, and there's even
a general consensus on the basics of what needs to happen. Can't we decide
what everything will be called /after/ we figure out better what needs to
be done? :)
- --
Rachel Blackman <rcb at ceruleanstudios.com>
Trillian Messenger - http://www.trillian.cc/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
iD8DBQE+7fHfzxcwfH0qMicRAtd5AKCIFJ00ubhBre4Q0JKyVf3EhRtUtwCfYyIX
CE8ZhM8ElD8sXiTE+Qm7Gcs=
=dmFQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the JDev
mailing list