[JDEV] Poll about who will use Jabber when Trillian comes out
Peter Saint-Andre
stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Jun 11 11:33:17 CDT 2003
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:50:06AM -0500, Thomas Muldowney wrote:
>
> I think this is a sign of a larger end user problem. We have no site
> that caters to end users, and we have no Jabber setup that caters to
> them either. Where is the interest matching? Where are the general
> chat rooms? They don't exist. We need an icq.com type deal for Jabber
> if we're truly going to start working on an end user face. I've wanted
> to do a site like that for a while now, but no one else has really
> seemed to want it or think it meritted the amount of effort it will take
> to do it properly. I guess the question keeps boiling down to, is this
> a major JSF/jabber.org problem? Are we supposed to foster the end user
> community and develop the protocol/system? I think that's just the tip
> of the iceberg for my thoughts, so if you want some more, just ask.
I agree, much more is needed than just an easy user guide. If we really
want to reach the average IM user, we need an icq.com-style portal that
makes users happy by providing general-interest chatrooms, easy ways to
find like-minded users, fun little quizzes and polls, games, and all
that jazz. I don't think this is something that the JSF would excel at,
so I doubt that it's a good focus for the JSF. But I do think that this
would take Jabber to the next level. People are offering Jabber-based
consumer services (nioki.com, etc.), but there is no "human face" to the
Jabber movemement. All I know is, it will be a lot of work to create and
maintain such a service. :)
--stpeter
More information about the JDev
mailing list