[JDEV] Using a port other than 5269 for server to server communication

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Well, I think that pretty much does it, since there are only two s2s
implementations that I'm aware of. :) Does anyone know of others?

Peter

On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 12:31:43PM -0600, David Waite wrote:
> The Jabber, Inc. s2s implementation (SCM) also properly handles SRV 
> records.
> 
> -David Waite
> 
> Matthias Wimmer wrote:
> 
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >Hi Richard!
> >
> >Richard Dobson wrote:
> >| Well in theory you could use a seperate sub domain of
> >test.netwin.co.nz and
> >| setup SRV records for it that use a port of 5270 instead of 5269, but
> >im not
> >| entirely sure if that works properly with the normal jabberd, ive
> >tried that
> >| before and the external jabberd's did not seem to always use the SRV
> >record
> >| and just kept trying to connect to 5269.
> >
> >jabberd14 and jabberd2 should use the different port if it is specified
> >in the SRV record. I don't know if other Jabber server implementations
> >are using the SRV record (and with jabberd14 it is possible to disable
> >SRV resolution, but I don't know why someone should do that).
> >
> >
> >Tot kijk
> >~    Matthias