[JDEV] More avatar thoughts
Thomas Charron
tcharron at ductape.net
Tue Sep 4 12:46:00 CDT 2001
Quoting Jens Alfke <jens at mac.com>:
> Thanks. Could you update this to include the support for public-XML
> access, since I think there is consensus that this is a good thing? (We
> do need to settle on a namespace for it; I suggest "jaber:iq:avatar" or
> is the intentional misspelling going to cause confusion?)
I think it was accidental.. 8-P Either that, or done intentionally so the
server would store it without requiring a module.. 8-P
> Oog. I strongly dislike this idea, primarily because OOB is still not
> fully worked out I've heard all kinds of workarounds to the
> firewall/NAT issue but none of them are really ready for prime time yet
> as far as I can tell. Also, it seems like a waste to me to have to fire
> up an HTTP micro-server, open a socket, potentially negotiate transfer
> directions or contact a relay server, etc. ... just to transfer a damn
> 2kbyte JPEG. Sure, I agree that the Jabber server shouldn't be in the
> business of transferring everyone's MP3 files around, but for tiny
> little stuff like this I don't see the overhead as significant.
Yea, gotta agree here.. OOB is probrably the wrong direction. I can
understand SUPPORTING it in the future, but the preliminary shouldn't be OOB..
---
Thomas Charron
<< Wanted: One decent sig >>
<< Preferably litle used >>
More information about the JDev
mailing list