[JDEV] guarantee of order?
Dustin Puryear
dpuryear at usa.net
Tue May 29 09:40:10 CDT 2001
Max Horn wrote:
>
> At 12:32 Uhr -0400 25.05.2001, Thomas Charron wrote:
> >From: Jens Alfke
> >Subject: Re: [JDEV] guarantee of order?
> >> Instead of making up new mechanisms like sequence numbers, why not just
> >have the server add a timestamp to every message via the jabber:x:delay
> >namespace?
> >
> > THAT would be a great idea, and provide much better message tracking..
>
> Uhm, no. Think of time sync isssues. This is not that great after
Would it be a real issue though? I would think the stamp would take
place at c2s. As long as a given cluster of Jabber servers servicing a
client population kept their time synced then the ORDER of time could be
relied on, even if the actual time on the initial server differed from
the target clients.
Still, I do like the sequencing idea better.
Regards, Dustin
--
Dustin Puryear <dpuryear at usa.net>
http://members.telocity.com/~dpuryear
In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams
More information about the JDev
mailing list