[JDEV] Renaming
John Hebert
john at vedalabs.com
Mon May 7 13:20:06 CDT 2001
I have to agree with temas's description of a resource. Location won't really convey
all the possible future uses of where a jabber enabled client will be used. Remember
that jabber is not necessarily a chat protocol.
I can easily imagine simultaneously running a number of jabber-enabled clients such
as an RSS viewer/agent, a jabber enabled multiplayer game, and a chat client.
Depending on one client to provide all of those services is wishful thinking, but
not realistic.
John Hebert
5/7/01 8:49:20 AM, temas <temas at box5.net> wrote:
>Another note is that resources are more and will be in the future more
>descriptive than just location. Some of our talk about next gen stuff
>has given resources a much stronger role of organizing the methods used
>to search and discover entities.
>
>How many of us really knew screenname, buddylist, and those other
>AOLisms meant at first? Yes they are self descriptive when you think
>about it, but so is resource, people just have to expand their mind and
>maybe read a dictionary.
>
>--temas
>
>On 04 May 2001 23:04:47 -0400, Julian Missig wrote:
>> The problem is that it will be referred to as resource everywhere
>> else... especially as we use more and more agents and
>> labels/instructions coming in from the server... then the users will
>> know "location" but have no idea what the "resource" is. The point of a
>> location/resource is somewhat lost if the user isn't aware of what it is
>> between clients.
>>
>> Julian
>>
>> On 04 May 2001 21:55:52 -0500, Justin Mecham wrote:
>> > I differ. Resources should remain as resource, since in reality, on a protocol level
>> > that's what they are. The protocal can be implemented however you wish. This is
>> > simply a client side issue. If you don't like the term resource, it's easy to change
>> > the label for it to say "Location" :)
>> >
>> > Justin
>> >
>> > ---- Original Message ----
>> > From:
>> > Julian Missig
>> > Date:
>> > Fri 5/4/01 21:48
>> > To:
>> > jdev at jabber.org
>> > Cc:
>> > James M. Cape
>> > Subject:
>> > [JDEV] Renaming "Resource"
>> >
>> > I realize it's quite late in the game to propose such a thing... but
>> > "resource" is a really confusing name. Several people with user
>> > interface experience and I feel that "location" would be a better name.
>> >
>> > While it may become quite common to have several applications on the
>> > same computer which will be accessing Jabber and thus need multiple
>> > resources, I think the word "location" gets the point across more
>> > quickly and would be better understood, even though the user is not
>> > technically at a different physical location when they're running a
>> > second client.
>> >
>> > Thoughts? Jer? Temas?
>> >
>> > Julian
>> > --
>> > email: julian at jabber.org
>> > jabber:julian at jabber.org
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > jdev mailing list
>> > jdev at jabber.org
>> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
>> >
>>
>> --
>> email: julian at jabber.org
>> jabber:julian at jabber.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jdev mailing list
>> jdev at jabber.org
>> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
>
>_______________________________________________
>jdev mailing list
>jdev at jabber.org
>http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
>
--
John Hebert
System Engineer
http://www.vedalabs.com
Changing your state of mind through sound.
More information about the JDev
mailing list