[JDEV] Unreliable?

[Max Metral]

I agree with that, but isn't this thread (also?) about normal IM messages
and the fact that you don't get positive ack for those either?

-----Original Message-----
From: Guy Hussussian [mailto:guy at driveway.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 2:09 PM
To: jdev at jabber.org
Subject: RE: RE: [JDEV] Unreliable?


Plain and simple. MSN does not support offline messages.  MSN requires that
all participants (clients) on a 'chat' connect to the same (MSN) server. If
the clients are not attached the message is rejected.

The MSN switchboard model at work here.

-G
guyh at driveway.com

-----Original Message-----
From: jdev-admin at jabber.org [mailto:jdev-admin at jabber.org]On Behalf Of
Max Metral
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 10:46 AM
To: 'jdev at jabber.org'
Subject: RE: RE: [JDEV] Unreliable?


Maybe I'm speaking out of turn here, but doesn't MSN Messenger already do
this (message ack)?  How did they implement it in their protocol?  (I don't
know what's happening behind, but when you IM someone sometimes it comes
back with a non-delivery error, even though other convos are working)

-----Original Message-----
From: temas [mailto:temas at box5.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 12:52 PM
To: jdev at jabber.org
Subject: RE: RE: [JDEV] Unreliable?


http://docs.jabber.org/draft-proto/html/events.html
http://docs.jabber.org/draft-proto/html/expire.html

Although not spec yet, we have discussed this issue before, and events
have some functionality tailored to that idea.

--temas

On 03 May 2001 10:01:34 -0500, Colin Madere wrote:
>
> Couldn't someone relatively easily build this into a client?  You could
sent
> "message receipt" messages with the ID of the message sent to you and the
> client could take care of keeping track of it.  Just send a message with
an
> <x> namespace that the special client knows to process differently.. no
> server mod necessary...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: travis at thinkvirtual.com [mailto:travis at thinkvirtual.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 5:25 PM
> To: jdev at jabber.org
> Subject: RE: RE: [JDEV] Unreliable?
>
>
> I couldn't imagine using a messenger in a business environment that didn't
> get all the messages through to me.  That would go straight into the trash
> can if I wasn't sure I was going to get a message or not.  I'm pretty sure
> that when using icq or the other messengers, you do not lose any messages,
> or I have never run across it at least and I've used icq for years now.
> This is probably the one thing that will make me switch back to icq (been
> using jabber for about a month now) until this is smoothed over.  It's not
> the lack of features because the most important thing here is messaging,
but
> the lack of reliability.
>
> I really think there should be a way of guaranteeing that a message was
> received.  Or if not, at least bounce it back.
>
> Travis
>
> ---- Original Message ----
> From: Colin Madere <colin at vedalabs.com>
> Sent: 2001-05-02 13:19:00.0
> To: "'jdev at jabber.org'" <jdev at jabber.org>
> Subject: RE: [JDEV] Unreliable?
>
>
>
> I don't know that everyone needs _guarenteed_ messaging (although I'm sure
> everyone would like it).  That does add overhead and client/server
> complexity.  I've looked into things such as SonicMQ, MQseries and JMS in
> general and a Jabber server/client developed on JMS would probably be an
> interesting thing to do.
> (JMS = Java Message Service)
> Are there any open standards out there regarding message queing /
guarenteed
> messages etc. besides JMS (since some people still don't like Java)?
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: temas [mailto:temas at box5.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 1:19 PM
> > To: jdev at jabber.org
> > Subject: Re: [JDEV] Unreliable?
> >
> >
> > What's the whole setup?
> >
> > As for messaging as you describe it, this is being discussed in JAM.
> >
> > --temas
> >
> > On 02 May 2001 10:20:25 -0600, travis at thinkvirtual.com wrote:
> > > My main concern with jabber is that you can't always be
> > guaranteed to receive a message.  Now most of my list is icq
> > buddies, but I miss a lot of messages.  I tell people to
> > email me if they want to make sure I get it.
> > >
> > > Now I'm not sure if this is the server or the client (i'm
> > using jim mostly)?  Or is it just that it's mostly from icq users?
> > >
> > > Could someone give me some insight into this?  Thanks.
> > >
> > > Travis Reeder
> > > Chief Software Architect
> > > ThinkVirtual
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > jdev mailing list
> > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdev mailing list
> > jdev at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> >
> _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev

_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
jdev at jabber.org
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
jdev at jabber.org
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev

_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
jdev at jabber.org
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev