[JDEV] Unreliable?

travis at thinkvirtual.com travis at thinkvirtual.com
Thu May 3 12:02:40 CDT 2001


Actually, you could be right, so the server might not register that you have logged off and so sends off messages to you still even though you aren't online. Just another reason to make the clients send back a "message received" to the server so the server can know to get rid of that message.

Travis

---- Original Message ----
From: Max Horn <max at quendi.de>
Sent: 2001-05-03 09:13:20.0
To: jdev at jabber.org
Subject: RE: Re: [JDEV] Unreliable?

At 11:34 Uhr -0600 02.05.2001, travis at thinkvirtual.com wrote:
>I think there should be some response from the client back to the 
>server letting it know that it has received the message and can then 
>delete.  If no response is returned, then it will retry, or wait 
>until another presence from the client has been sent.  Something 
>along those lines anyway.  It's impossible to get to trust something 
>like this unless you know without a doubt that you are not going to 
>miss any messages.


I wonder if this is related to the bug I described some days ago on 
this mailing list (but never got a reply) related to muliple 
presence, and the lack of automatical delivery of <presence 
type="unavailable"/> ... the server normally should broadcast this 
when a user logs off, but sometimes doesn't. So far whenever I got 
this it was related to multiple resources, though.


Max
-- 
-----------------------------------------------
Max Horn
C++/ObjC/Java Developer

email: <mailto:max at quendi.de>
phone: (+49) 6151-494890




More information about the JDev mailing list