[JDEV] Unreliable?

[Colin Madere]

I don't know that everyone needs _guarenteed_ messaging (although I'm sure
everyone would like it).  That does add overhead and client/server
complexity.  I've looked into things such as SonicMQ, MQseries and JMS in
general and a Jabber server/client developed on JMS would probably be an
interesting thing to do.

(JMS = Java Message Service)

Are there any open standards out there regarding message queing / guarenteed
messages etc. besides JMS (since some people still don't like Java)?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: temas [mailto:temas at box5.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 1:19 PM
> To: jdev at jabber.org
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] Unreliable?
> 
> 
> What's the whole setup?
> 
> As for messaging as you describe it, this is being discussed in JAM.
> 
> --temas
> 
> On 02 May 2001 10:20:25 -0600, travis at thinkvirtual.com wrote:
> > My main concern with jabber is that you can't always be 
> guaranteed to receive a message.  Now most of my list is icq 
> buddies, but I miss a lot of messages.  I tell people to 
> email me if they want to make sure I get it.  
> > 
> > Now I'm not sure if this is the server or the client (i'm 
> using jim mostly)?  Or is it just that it's mostly from icq users?  
> > 
> > Could someone give me some insight into this?  Thanks.
> > 
> > Travis Reeder
> > Chief Software Architect
> > ThinkVirtual
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdev mailing list
> > jdev at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.jabber.org/jdev/attachments/20010502/544c92db/attachment-0002.htm>