[JDEV] JavaJabber Server Docs

[Colin Madere]

I'd have to agree with Iain.

I think it would be good to see how two different implementations solved the
problem of implementing the common protocol/features.  However, it would be
nice if one group got stuck on a design problem and they could look at how
it was solved by the other group.

> --- Jay Lorenzo <jlorenzo at uswest.net> wrote:
> > One thing I'd like to throw out here is the possibility of using a
> > common
> > design with the Jabelin folks. I think we may be best served by
> > participating in the design process with the Jabelin folks, which I
> > believe
> > is just starting this process. We may want to consider 
> having a 'subsig'
> > under Jabelin, using an 'org.jabber' namespace.
> 
> I actually think it would better serve the Jabber 
> community if the two servers were developed 
> independently.  One of the more interesting things 
> I'd be looking for is what is implementaton specific 
> and what is standard Jabber.  This has been 
> exceedingly difficult to determine with just jabberd. 
> Something very different in implmentation could be 
> extremely useful...
> 
> -iain
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.jabber.org/jdev/attachments/20010709/e74f4ba9/attachment-0002.htm>