[JDEV] Message timestamping - hybrid format

Daniel Arbuckle djarb at wvc-omak.ctc.edu
Sun Oct 10 00:58:56 CDT 1999


heheh. I have a habit of attempting to improve people's proposals, even
when they compete with what I think is the right way to do things (as in
this case). It seems to produce valuable results.

Daniel

On Sat, 9 Oct 1999, Scott Robinson wrote:

> I'd like to drop the suble comment that a proposal has been made.
> 
> I'd also like to note that most of the Jabber team would prefer a "standard"
> system of dating. ;)
> 
> Scott.
> 
> * Julian Missig translated into ASCII [Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 01:27:27AM -0400][<380023BF.1AFA27AB at linuxpower.org>]
> > On 1999-10-10, Daniel Arbuckle wrote:
> > > If you're going to do dates like that, the obvious choice would be to use
> > > the Julian Day Number. The algorithms are well documented, the standard
> > > predates computers by centuries and is widely understood, and date
> > > calculations are easy.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Daniel
> > 
> > Yep. Julian Day Number works for me.
> > 
> > 
> > Julian
> > ;)
> > -- 
> > eMail: julian at linuxpower.org
> > ICQ: 1521358
> > http://www.delanet.com/~jkmissig/
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdev mailing list
> > jdev at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > 
> 





More information about the JDev mailing list