[JDEV] Message timestamping and route tracking

David Mitts david at fired-up.com
Tue Oct 5 06:04:45 CDT 1999


Well, I think the date/time format itself isn't that important - as long as
the clients know how the server is sending it, reformatting it is a piece of
cake.

Josh

----------
>From: Lloyd Weehuizen <tuna at freeworldbbs.org>
>To: jdev at jabber.org
>Subject: Re: [JDEV] Message timestamping and route tracking
>Date: Tue, Oct 5, 1999, 12:19 AM
>

> On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Scott Robinson wrote:
>
>> Oy! A simple discussion on timestamp format turns into routing issues. (the
>> following suggestions are in an unposted proposal) We obviously are to
>> damn smart.
>
> heheh I think this format is a very good idea, except I would argue to use
> the ISO standard rather than the RFC in this format as it seems to be
> waisting an awful lot of characters :)
>
>>
>> Example:
>>
>>   <transport id="jabber:pagertransport://pager.mot.com/"
>>              received="Mon,  4 Oct 1999 18:35:52 -0700"
>>              sent="Mon,  4 Oct 1999 18:35:54 -0700">
>>   Motorola Two-Way Paging Service
>>   </transport>
>>
>
> <transport id="jabber:pagertransport://pager.mot.com/"
>        recv="19991005T17:18:12"
>        sent="19991005T17:19:02">
>        Your Unique Caption Here
> <transport>
>
> Just my 2c worth :)
>
> Lloyd
>
>    <=- Lloyd Weehuizen -- tuna at cableaction.co.nz -=>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> 




More information about the JDev mailing list