[JDEV] Message timestamps

[Josh Mitts]

Why not just have a <message timestamp="whatever"> instead of <message> 
<timestamp> ?

Josh

----------
>From: Thomas Charron <tcharron at ductape.net>
>To: jdev at jabber.org
>Subject: Re: [JDEV] Message timestamps
>Date: Mon, Oct 4, 1999, 3:15 PM
>

> Quoting David Waite <mass at ufl.edu>:
>
>> On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Thomas Charron wrote:
>> >   It was actually talked about, but no one ever made up a proposal for
>> it.
>> > IMHO, it would be a great, optional thing to have, but the format should
>> stick
>> > to the timestamp definitions that are part of RFC821.  I'll include the
>> snippet
>> > that deals with it below:
>> Ugh! please no, if you have control of the time stamp structure, don't
>> make it more complex by having a million optional formats.
>
>   This is the RFC for date/time stamps in SMTP.  Nothing is more widely used.
> ---
> Thomas Charron
> << Wanted: One decent sig >>
> << Preferably litle used  >>
> << and stored in garage.  ?>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
>