[JDEV] More protocol issues...

[Thomas D. Charron]

  Yep..  I'd say the only one that we would want to implement AT THE MOMENT would be the timestamp with a cdata for the initial timestamp.  Once we have that, adding child elements within the timestamp would be simple..
---
Thomas Charron

On Thu, 29 Jul 1999 16:29:14   Anders Qvist wrote:
>On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Thomas D. Charron wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 29 Jul 1999 09:53:25   Lindsay.Marshall wrote:
>>
>> >Looking at the dtd in 0.6 I see that there appears to be no way of
>> >including  a date/timestamp with a sent message. It seems to me to be
>> >vital that when I read a message I know the time at which it was
>> >generated - "meet you in 5 minutes" is no good if I dont see the
>> >message until 2 hours after it was generated. (sure you can timestamp
>> >on arrival at the client but that's no good if you are not logged in)
>> >
>> >Of course this may be there already and I just haven't found it yet.
>>
>>   Good point..  One could add it in <ext> tags, but I'd say that
>> this would be much better to add in a <timestamp> tag within a
>> message.. 
>> 
>>   I'd say that this can be added sometime next week, after Jer get's
>> the new server up and everything moved over.. 
>
>A thought in the matter. Each mail server stamp a message. May there be
>a similar need here for multiple time stamps in Jabber? Maybe it
>should look like this:
>
><timestamp>
>  <server>...</server>
>  <server>...</server>
>  <proxy>...</proxy>
></timestamp>
>
>Or something similar:
>
><timestamp>
>  <type>relay</type>
>  <server>a.b.c</server>
>  <time>...</time>
></timestamp>
><timestamp>
>  ...
></timestamp>
>
>Mind you, this sounds low-priority to me.
>
>Anders "Quest" Qvist
>NetGuide Scandinavia
>
>-- Why suffer scarcity? Look for the Open Source and enter a world of plenty!
>
>


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.