[JDEV] Minor 'bug'let ?
Jeremie Miller
jeremie at netins.net
Tue Jan 5 14:28:13 CST 1999
> Though I admit that I do not completely understand the code; a minor
> buglet showed up on FreeBSD (if you optimize and non-null your structs).
> [snippet smooshed]
> Otherwise if the read_fd_set happens to contani cruft, the accept
> further down is triggered tooo easily.
Yes, thanks, nasty little bug that happened when I just rearranged a bunch
of that code... thanks! Should appear in the nightly build.
>
> Secondly, given that the active_fd_set is (re)build each time; it
> is worthwhile to keep a maxfd; rather than FD_SETSIZE; at least
> on FreeBSD that makes a speed difference.
I'm no god on this select stuff, so could you explain what you mean? I'm
not sure what the FD_SETSIZE really does I guess.
>
> Thirdly setting TCP_NODELAY and alllowing for port REUSE might be
> nice.
> if( (setsockopt(c->id,SOL_SOCKET,SO_REUSEADDR,(const char
> *)&one,sizeof(one))) <0)
This one is already in the socket.c file.
> if( (setsockopt(c->id,IPPROTO_TCP,TCP_NODELAY,(const void
> *)&one,sizeof(one))) <0)
What does TCP_NODELAY exactly do? I've read up on some of this stuff, but
it's not always clear.
Jer
More information about the JDev
mailing list